In 2012, the Indian government told the Hon’ble Supreme Court that there were about 25 lakh gay men who constituted about 0.002% of then total Indian population in India1. The landmark Section 377 judgement of 2018 affected an estimated 10.4 crore (0.08%) Indians2. Conservative Western counts hover around 2%3. If we take this percentage and extrapolate it in Indian context considering that LGBT is universal, the figure of total gay people in India should be 2.7 crores or 2% of 135 crore.
There is no credible total LGBT figures in India which is not odd, just under-reported. When we talk of India, we talk of ideas as colonial as the British. We talk of ideas ranging from the peaceful Buddha to the raging Guru Gobind. There are about 5 lakh Ahmadis and zero Sufis. Sufis are Sunnis (like Wahhabis) who form the dominant 85% of Indian Muslims, who are opposed to all minorities, as evident from Kashmir Valley's opposition to Srinagar Pride Parade 2020.
Some recent twitter trends ran by LGBT leaders were #NoPinkWashing, #NoHomoNationalism, and #NotinOurName. These trends lack depth. LGBT appropriated the colour pink, nobody can make them anymore pinker. What does HomoNationalism even mean? Why is this absurdity cool? #NotInOurName ? Five hundred Twitter LGBT activists do not decide the fate of any community whose numbers run in crores. The ideals of liberté, égalité, fraternité which came out of the French Revolution of 1789 led to the ascent of Napoleon, via the Jacobins. This blog is an attempt by a heterosexual conservative Indian LGBT ally to show truth to power and it prays not to be catalogued as fascist.
HISTORY
The idea of India is wide enough to accommodate polar opposites like British colonialism and Buddha’s peace. The dominant way of life is Sanatan. Majority follows Hinduism who are divided in innumerable brackets. Buddhists form 0.7%, they are divided into Traditional Buddhists (13%) and the newly converted Ambedkarites (87%). Sikhs, the follower of Guru Gobind, form 60% of Punjab, 1.7% of India but 20% of the Indian army. This should not be odd because war is the conserver of the Khalsa and peace a dissolvent. There are about 5 lakh Ahmadis and zero Sufis. Sufis are Sunnis (like Wahhabis) who form 85% of Indian Muslims. Muslims are interspersed throughout India forming 20% in 86 districts and majority in 19 or 2.81% districts. LGBTs belong to all castes and communities. LGBTs in India are as varied as the colours and faiths of India. They have been here even since before the idea of the law came into the human mind. They were here before humans thoughts of faith, laws, castes and class. Though, their challenge to oppression by victimhood, not merit and skills is new.
Some cultures used to burn LGBT communities at stakes, some used to put their necks on altars, some put their necks to swords, some threw them in gas-chambers, some in gulags but a few were wiser. They were simply trying earnestly to accept and accommodate LGBT. Most cultures chose to persecute LGBT while some rewarded them for merit, or at least tried to tolerate. LGBT-tolerant societies are remarkedly more compassionate than the societies who don’t. LGBT community is visible because they simply chose to. Gaga did for her generation what Bowie did 20 years earlier. She re-queered a mundane mainstream. After all, the LGBT mannerisms caricatured by people are mere exaggerations of reel life behaviour, which are in turn decided by genes which account for upto 25% of non-heterosexual behaviour. Some blend in, some blend out while some simply fake it. The ones with merit become Oscar Wilde, Alan Turing, Prince, David Bowie, Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Dutee Chand, Martina Navratilova and Billie Jean King. Like all communities, LGBT-related controversies and crimes keep happening now and then. A 2012 Cambridge study shows that LGBTs tend to be more intelligent than non-LGBT individuals4. This explains their heightened anxiety and empathy because higher the intelligence, higher the empathy5.
The idea of India is wide enough to accommodate polar opposites like British colonialism and Buddha’s peace. The dominant way of life is Sanatan. Majority follows Hinduism who are divided in innumerable brackets. Buddhists form 0.7%, they are divided into Traditional Buddhists (13%) and the newly converted Ambedkarites (87%). Sikhs, the follower of Guru Gobind, form 60% of Punjab, 1.7% of India but 20% of the Indian army. This should not be odd because war is the conserver of the Khalsa and peace a dissolvent. There are about 5 lakh Ahmadis and zero Sufis. Sufis are Sunnis (like Wahhabis) who form 85% of Indian Muslims. Muslims are interspersed throughout India forming 20% in 86 districts and majority in 19 or 2.81% districts. LGBTs belong to all castes and communities. LGBTs in India are as varied as the colours and faiths of India. They have been here even since before the idea of the law came into the human mind. They were here before humans thoughts of faith, laws, castes and class. Though, their challenge to oppression by victimhood, not merit and skills is new.
Some cultures used to burn LGBT communities at stakes, some used to put their necks on altars, some put their necks to swords, some threw them in gas-chambers, some in gulags but a few were wiser. They were simply trying earnestly to accept and accommodate LGBT. Most cultures chose to persecute LGBT while some rewarded them for merit, or at least tried to tolerate. LGBT-tolerant societies are remarkedly more compassionate than the societies who don’t. LGBT community is visible because they simply chose to. Gaga did for her generation what Bowie did 20 years earlier. She re-queered a mundane mainstream. After all, the LGBT mannerisms caricatured by people are mere exaggerations of reel life behaviour, which are in turn decided by genes which account for upto 25% of non-heterosexual behaviour. Some blend in, some blend out while some simply fake it. The ones with merit become Oscar Wilde, Alan Turing, Prince, David Bowie, Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Dutee Chand, Martina Navratilova and Billie Jean King. Like all communities, LGBT-related controversies and crimes keep happening now and then. A 2012 Cambridge study shows that LGBTs tend to be more intelligent than non-LGBT individuals4. This explains their heightened anxiety and empathy because higher the intelligence, higher the empathy5.
Currently, India is witnessing a spike in LGBT rights activism. The problem with the Indian version of LGBT activism is that it is an urbane elitist movement that apes the West blindly without caring for the rural members who face increasing antagonization. LGBT movements rose in the 1960s. It got a massive global push in the last decade helped by the dawn of internet3. The chants of this decade-old emancipatory pride parade were so high, they reached as far as Delhi, a historically war-torn and conservative city. So, how conservative is Indian society really? In 2011, Pulitzer Prize-winning author Joseph Lelyveld released a book titled ‘Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle With India’ which suggested that Gandhi had a homosexual relationship with his ‘soulmate’, the Lithuanian architect Dr. Hermann Kallenbach6. Gujarat was quick to ban the book after which the Indian government dished out $1.28 million to purchase an archive more than 1,000 letters and documents exchanged between the two men, thus removing it from a potential public auction in London7.
An ‘international’ Delhi school takes schoolchildren to LGBT pride parades annually since 20168. Activists are pleading other schools to take up such initiatives but they have not found success yet because schools realise they operate in India and that acquirement of knowledge is an age-restricted process. A teenager kid is not expected to possess the wisdom of her sixty-year-old grandmother. The process of acquiring knowledge is accretionary. It proceeds step-by-step and missing any step confuses both the process and the learner.
Building
block games like Legos and model construction games like Mechanix
come pre-rated for eight-year-olds, eighteen-year-olds
and even twenty-eight
year-olds. Human life progresses in stages. Schools
cede higher learning to colleges and universities. The
modern trend of LGBT activism ignores (and defies)
this simple wisdom. It rises in defiance and claims
a good share of the media narrative. This worries conservative and
traditional societies. The noble
intentions of internationalist schools and individualist activists
are brave but these intentions risk being deemed bravado if they do
not factor in the handicaps that plague Indian schools and societies.
Like all emancipatory movements that are driven by ideas, passion, purpose,
empathy and alienation, the LGBT movement in India wants too much too
quick while risking all that it has gained so far.
TOO
FAST, TOO FURIOUS
In a rush to look ‘cool’, many LGBT activists don ‘anti-establishment’ garbs. They frequently forget that where there is no law, there is no freedom. They forget that individuals do not come into the world as fully formed adults. They forget that forcing gender issues on people is as wrong as people forcing gender issues on LGBT. They forget that kids gain wisdom through trial & error. Radical LGBT activists probably paint children as mini-adults. A common thread running through the ‘anti-establishment’ fan club in all communities is their ignorance and contempt of the simple truth that the maximum amount of freedom permissible for individuals must be consistent with maintenance of social order.
Section 377 was decriminalised, re-criminalised and again decriminalised within the span of a decade after standing strong in oft-misuse for 157 long years until it was fell by a modern and forward-looking honourable Supreme Court. The draconian victorian law vaguely says that ‘Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine’. The quick pace of upheaval is proving too much for a slow-moving Indian society to tolerate. LGBT community’s insistence on speed of changes, rather than quality of change creates chasms between Indians who support LGBT, Indians who tolerate LGBT, Indians who oppose LGBT and Indians who are LGBTs.
Section 377 was decriminalised, re-criminalised and again decriminalised within the span of a decade after standing strong in oft-misuse for 157 long years until it was fell by a modern and forward-looking honourable Supreme Court. The draconian victorian law vaguely says that ‘Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine’. The quick pace of upheaval is proving too much for a slow-moving Indian society to tolerate. LGBT community’s insistence on speed of changes, rather than quality of change creates chasms between Indians who support LGBT, Indians who tolerate LGBT, Indians who oppose LGBT and Indians who are LGBTs.
Thankfully
for India, it is not a theocracy or a monarchy. Even the most radical
of elements would agree that India is a nation of nations, an ocean
of oceans, that India is an idea bound by the Indian ocean in the
South and the Himalayas in the North. Thankfully current crop of
Indian politicians are too prude to even mention LGBTs in a political
rally. How long before a younger and more ‘cool’ set of leaders
start utilising the sexual and gender fissures to seek votes? Faiths
can afford politics, movements can not. Indian LGBT community’s
steps risk
being cut short by rising alienation
within a democracy that debates and discusses facts before
legislating.
LGBT pride parades are about gender and sexual rights. Their roots lie in the Pre-Lenten carnivals9 and festivals which evolved after emancipation from French planters. The planters were shocked that the freed slaves were not vengeful but instead taking to the streets, beating drums, dancing and chanting songs merrily. Modern carnivals retain this tradition of handing the streets over to the people who become living art. São Paulo in Brazil has the most traditional LGBT groups of street Carnival in the world10. Pre-Carnival pride parades are led by ‘Minhoqueens’, a street Carnival group celebrating drag queens with a lot of gay divas and pop music.
For
many this is a time to party, while some make serious artistic,
intellectual statements and political commentary. The
intellect and politics influence impressionable minds.
The pride parades in the West are child-friendly events that people
have grown accustomed to over a long period of time, while India has
just come out of the closet,
energising many who stayed silent. Mikhail Bakhtin, a
Russian philosopher spoke of
carnivals as
events where all rules, inhibitions, restrictions and regulations
which determined the course of everyday life were suspended along
with all forms of hierarchies in societies, where everything banned
was suddenly allowed, where eccentricity was permitted and where
profanity defeated piety. Indian LGBT activists risk riling a pious
conservative society
if they turn the volume of profanities up because
law is not free to treat school-going juveniles as adults and
it is more often than not sympathetic to college-going truants.
The growth of LGBT activism in the West was not smooth. In Nazi Germany Jews wore yellow stars, gay men wore large pink triangles, Romanis wore brown triangles, political prisoners wore red, criminals wore green, immigrants wore blue, Jehovah's Witnesses wore purple, asocial people like prostitutes and lesbians wore Black11. After World War II, the growth in LGBT movement happened in spurts and it ignored societal thresholds of tolerance, which in turned helped the religious opposition to consolidate thus making the path to civic liberty bumpy. It exploded after the Stonewall Riots of 1969 which kicked off the global movement12. The resentment had been brewing for long which resulted in ensuing violence.
Before
activists jump on the sexual revolution boat they must understand that
Indian democracy, unlike the West, did
not get the luxury of time. LGBT activists seek rapid change in a
stagnant, traditional, and
delicately balanced Indian society which puts
them on a collision course that might undo all their gains. The
society is too big and too complex. They can not revolutionise it.
They can only influence a wee
bit. Involving schoolkids in sexual revolutions will
vex parents, increase parental fears which LGBT dislike and ridicule. They
choose to
ignore the fact that the parental guard
against LGBT
is as genetic as the LGBT
genes
because gay sons and lesbian daughters can not reproduce naturally.
Parent-hating radicalised class like the
Antifa rioters in the USA
are zipping around burning
shops and cars,
playing their versions of Grand Theft Auto.
BULLIES
The LGB part of LGBT is sexual. Lesbian is a self-label for a woman whose sexual and emotional attractions are for other women. Gay is a self-label for a person whose sexual and emotional attractions are for the same sex, typically in reference to men. Bisexual is a term used to refer to a person whose sexual orientation, behaviour and interest include both the same and other sex. The T in LGBT stands for Transgender - an umbrella term for people whose gender expression is non-conforming and/or whose gender identity is different from their birth sex. Then there are gender-nonconforming people may or may not identify as LGBT. Compared to peers who reported low levels of school victimization, LGBT young adults reported high levels of school victimization during adolescence. They are 2.6x more likely to report clinical levels of depression, 5.6x more likely to report having attempted suicide, 5.6x more likely to report a suicide attempt that required medical care and 2x more likely to have been diagnosed with virus-like HIV13.
India is fond of aping Western trends. A poll of more than 1,000 teachers working in UK primary or secondary schools revealed that 13% of children are bullied because of their sexuality. This is compared to 11% because of their race, 7% because of their gender and 2% because of their religion. The bullying is not one-sided. LGBT are severely bullied within LGBT circles too, often living lives of a hostage to self-created portraits, much like Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray. Militant activism does not help when Indian governments and schools can barely provide safety to kids. Activists, governments and schools have no right to preach sexual morality or sexual violence because of misplaced revolutionary zeal. The mean age of self-identification as lesbian or gay is around 16 for all genders. The age group between 14-18 can be safely said to be most vulnerable to peer pressure, pop-culture and forced homogenization of ideas.
For each year children delay labeling themselves as LGBT, the suicide risk is reduced by 20%. A lot of children are just confused, perhaps, terribly confused because of lack of media literacy. 94% of school-age kids who identify as transgenders grow out of their desire to change genders as adults if parents and schools stop encouraging them to internalize and publicize their LGBT identities14. How high is the bullying pressure exactly? Dr. Robert Spitzer, a leading figure in the study of homosexuality whose work was embraced and celebrated by LGBT rights activists until he authored a study in 2003. The abstract of this study finished with the line: “Thus, there is evidence that change in sexual orientation following some form of reparative therapy does occur in some gay men and lesbians.” He was suggesting that ‘highly motivated’ individuals can reorient sexual behaviour. The LGBT juggernaut and Transgender rights activists brought immense pressure on him, eventually extracting an apology in 2012 from the eighty-year-old veteran. This despite Dr Robert Spritzer being the one to have earlier led the movement which resulted in 1973 declassification of homosexuality as a mental illness in the US15.
India is fond of aping Western trends. A poll of more than 1,000 teachers working in UK primary or secondary schools revealed that 13% of children are bullied because of their sexuality. This is compared to 11% because of their race, 7% because of their gender and 2% because of their religion. The bullying is not one-sided. LGBT are severely bullied within LGBT circles too, often living lives of a hostage to self-created portraits, much like Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray. Militant activism does not help when Indian governments and schools can barely provide safety to kids. Activists, governments and schools have no right to preach sexual morality or sexual violence because of misplaced revolutionary zeal. The mean age of self-identification as lesbian or gay is around 16 for all genders. The age group between 14-18 can be safely said to be most vulnerable to peer pressure, pop-culture and forced homogenization of ideas.
For each year children delay labeling themselves as LGBT, the suicide risk is reduced by 20%. A lot of children are just confused, perhaps, terribly confused because of lack of media literacy. 94% of school-age kids who identify as transgenders grow out of their desire to change genders as adults if parents and schools stop encouraging them to internalize and publicize their LGBT identities14. How high is the bullying pressure exactly? Dr. Robert Spitzer, a leading figure in the study of homosexuality whose work was embraced and celebrated by LGBT rights activists until he authored a study in 2003. The abstract of this study finished with the line: “Thus, there is evidence that change in sexual orientation following some form of reparative therapy does occur in some gay men and lesbians.” He was suggesting that ‘highly motivated’ individuals can reorient sexual behaviour. The LGBT juggernaut and Transgender rights activists brought immense pressure on him, eventually extracting an apology in 2012 from the eighty-year-old veteran. This despite Dr Robert Spritzer being the one to have earlier led the movement which resulted in 1973 declassification of homosexuality as a mental illness in the US15.
With Assembly Bill 1266, California became the first American state to require public schools to allow transgender students to use restrooms and participate on sports teams matching the gender with which they identify, rather than their biological sex. Indian kids die in schools with disturbing frequency, sometimes simply by having mid day meal or visiting washrooms. Students who were questioning their sexual orientation reported the most bullying, the most homophobic victimization, the most drug use, the most feelings of depression and suicidality, and more truancy than either heterosexual or LGB students. A positive school climate and a lack of homophobic victimization moderated the differences among sexual orientation status and outcomes16.
Transgender
activists pressure both doctors and parents to consent to
“gender-affirming medical treatment” for children who otherwise
likely would grow to accept their bodies. Such treatment typically
starts with puberty blockers at age 8, cross-sex hormones at 14, and
genital surgery for boys as young as 17. Western schools are hiring
drag-queens as part of LGBT awareness. This is too much activism not
just for comfort, but also for common sense. A young American
transgender writer, Andrea Long Chu whose book ‘On Liking Women’
is credited with launching ‘the second wave’ of trans studies
described Gender Dysphoria in an opinion piece - “Dysphoria
feels like being unable to get warm, no matter how many layers you
put on. It feels like hunger without appetite. It feels like getting
on an airplane to fly home, only to realize mid-flight that this is
it: You’re going to spend the rest of your life on an airplane. It
feels like grieving. It feels like having nothing to grieve17.”
This account is disturbing but it is what it is. Gender is more about
mind than the body.
Even
a cool President like Obama admitted that even the best studies do
not report improvement after reassignment surgery. Chu acknowledged
in her opinion piece “I was not suicidal before hormones. Now I
often am.” Leon Kass, a professor emeritus at the University of
Chicago says, “Today a doctor is often seen as nothing more than
a highly competent hired syringe18.” Dr.
Ryan T. Anderson of The Heritage Foundation notes - “If a
patient wants to fix her nose or change his gender, determine the sex
of unborn children, or take euphoriant drugs just for kicks, the
physician can and will go to work, provided that the price is right
and that the contract is explicit about what happens if the customer
isn’t satisfied19.” Chu claimed in her opinion
that she was “engaged in ‘compassion-mongering’, peddling
bigotry in the guise of sympathetic concern”.
Transgendered men do not become women, nor do transgendered women
become men.
Dr.
Paul McHugh, professor and former
psychiatrist in chief at Johns Hopkins Medical School wrote in an
opinion piece that all,
including Bruce Jenner, become feminized men or masculinized women,
counterfeits or impersonators of the sex with which they ‘identify’.
Over
the last ten or fifteen years, this phenomenon has increased
exponentially.
Although
transgender
who choose for gender re-assignment
may be encouraged by
public
reception, they
must know that
young
children and adults
generally come to their ideas about their sex not through erotic
interests but through a variety of youthful psychosocial conflicts
and concerns20.”
Gender
dysphoria has
become cool like Emo culture which normalised self-harm and GTA like
video games that have normalised school shootings and suicides.
Whether
people may like it or not, gender
dysphoria is
a disorder
anorexia nervosa and body dysmorphic disorder. McHugh
writes in his piece, “Its
treatment should not be directed at the body as with surgery and
hormones any more than one treats obesity-fearing anorexic patients
with liposuction. The treatment should strive to correct the false,
problematic nature of the assumption and to resolve the psychosocial
conflicts provoking it21.”
![]() |
| Dr Paul McHugh |
Instagram savvy young girls believe that a sexy appearance brings them power because it gets them attention from potential ‘friends’, groomers and online predators. The belief that girls are sexual objects starts from boys’ tendency to sexually harass girls in school and it affects young girls adversely. Sexual harassment by boys and men is a regular part of school and work-life. Internet is merely furthering the numbness. In US schools Peers perpetrate 79% of the sexual harassment in schools and much of this harassment is in the form of sexual jokes, leering, touching or grabbing areas like the breasts or buttocks, and comments on physical appearance22. The consequences of sexual harassment are far-reaching, can be long-lasting and personality altering at great costs to schools and consequences to society in general.
One study of the estimated economic cost of sexual harassment in the U.S.Army, for example, found that in one year alone, the cost of sexual harassment was over $250 billion23. The difference between American and Indian approaches towards children can be gathered from the fact that Americans start teaching their kids the importance and usage of 911 from the age of four24 while Indian children are the most malnourished kids on the sad face of Earth. They are weak physically25. Children and teenagers now a days hold their parents hostage. More the privilege, tighter the grip. Schools must look into their wards’ health and safety first, sexual revolution can wait because schools can not handle the bullying and depression that will come dressed as pop-culture. There is absolutely no need to push the revolutionary new pills down the simple, caring and protective Indian parents’ throat. Let them be. They are old. The world is crazy. The economy is down. Everybody is scared. It is a humane thing to do. This is normal and natural, seemingly ‘cool’ cancel culture is not cool in real life. It is alienating.
FORCE
LGBT community is often demonised as encouraging paedophillic behavior. These allegations are results of the community’s militant activism and general homophobia. Members of disliked minority groups are often stereotyped as representing a danger to the majority's most vulnerable members. At any given time a child is more at risk of molestation from heterosexuals than homosexuals. Gregory Herek26 of University of California at Davis writes in his blog "The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children." Herek adds that those who study paedophilia say that one cannot make the association between sexual attraction towards children and sexual orientation, gay or straight. He maintains that child molesters cannot be described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals because they are not incapable of an adult relationship.
Whatever the causal route, sexual orientation may or may not be a choice. Even prepubertal erotic experiences can evolve into irreversible sexual orientations. The popular ‘anti-discriminatory’ and ‘anti-establishment’ motived political correctness does not factor in complex and postnatal developmental factors that bring more harm than good. The technical and accurate term for kids who may be potential gays and lesbians is Prehomosexual. It conveys both disturbing biological determinism and clinical interventionism. The stereotypes range from an unusually effeminate and solitary little boy coupled with interests in dolls, makeup, princesses, dresses and dislike for rough play with other boys to little girls with outwardly boyish personality with an aversion to all the perfumed, delicate, laced trappings of femininity. These behaviours tell parents about their child’s sexuality which leads to fear, loath and onset of adult homosexuality. A cross-cultural data published by Fernando Luiz Cardoso of Santa Catarina State University in 2008 showed that young pre-homosexual males are attracted to solitary sports, such as swimming, cycling, or tennis, over rougher contact sports, such as football or soccer, and also that they are less likely to be childhood bullies. It is fashionable these days to say that one is born gay, but if we think more critically, it’s nonsensical and probably criminal to refer to a newborn infant as being homosexual.
In
looking carefully at the childhoods of now-gay adults, researchers
find early behavioural indicators that homosexuals seem to have in
common. J. Michael Bailey, a psychologist from Northwestern
University, and Canadian psychiatrist Kenneth Zucker14
published the seminal paper on childhood markers of homosexuality
with their controversial 1995 review article in Developmental
Psychology. Their aim “was to review the evidence concerning the
possible association between childhood sex-typed behaviour and adult
sexual orientation.” Their work wasn’t about identifying the
causes of homosexuality but about indexing the childhood correlation
of same-sex attraction. It simply meant to index the non-erotic
behavioural clues that best predicted which child will turn gay and
which won't. Unsurprisingly, the most salient sex-typed behaviours
were
observed in the domain of play. Boys engage in what developmental
psychologists refer to as 'rough-and-tumble play' whereas girls are
calmer. Little boys tend to gravitate towards toy guns and cars while
girls like hyperfeminized dolls. Young kids of both sexes are
imaginative so they pretend-play, but the roles that the two sexes
prefer are gender-segregated by as early as two years of age.
Bailey
and Zucker hypothesized that homosexuals show an inverted pattern of
sex-typed childhood behaviours measurable over a Kinsey scale over a
long time, usually 16 years. As with all approaches, this too is not
fail-safe. In 2008, University of Toronto psychologist Kelley
Drummond interviewed 25 adult women who, as children between 3-12
years of age, were referred by their parents for assessment at a
mental health clinic. As adults, only 12% of these women grew up to
be gender dysphoric which is the uncomfortable sense that one’s
biological sex does not match one’s gender identity. The
researchers found that the odds of these women reporting a
bisexual/homosexual orientation was up to 23x higher than would
normally occur in a general sample of young women.
Bailey
and Zucker revealed 89% of randomly sampled gay men recalled
cross-sex-typed childhood behaviours exceeding the heterosexual
median. Critics say participants’ memories may be distorted to fit
with societal expectations and stereotypes but in 2008 Northwestern
University’s Gerulf Rieger gathered evidence from childhood home
videos validating the retrospective method. There is evidence of
'Dosage effect' - the more gender-nonconforming characteristics there
are in childhood, the more likely it is that a homosexual/bisexual
orientation will be present in adulthood.
![]() |
| Kenneth Zucker |
![]() |
| Michael Bailey |
Although
gender-atypical behaviour in childhood is strongly correlated with
adult homosexuality, it is still an imperfect correlation. Not all
little boys who like to wear dresses grow up to be gay, nor do all
little girls who despise dresses become lesbians. Researchers readily
concede that there are multiple and very complicated developmental
routes to adult homosexuality. Heritable, biological factors interact
with environmental experiences to produce phenotypic outcomes. Those
children who show pronounced sex-atypical behaviors may have more
genetic load towards homosexuality, whereas gay adults who were
sex-typical as children might trace their homosexuality more directly
to particular childhood experiences. A 2010 Archives of Sexual
Behavior report hint intriguingly that men, but not women, who were
sexually abused as children are significantly more likely than
non-abused males to have had homosexual relationships as adults.
PRIORITIES
The
2015-16 All-India Survey on Higher Education calculated total
enrolment in Indian higher education at 34.5
crores.
In
line with 19th
century
Victorian
English
attitudes, Indian edcuation system is focused on discipline, not
intelligence or innovation that
are much needed in the present 21st
century.
Indian
education
has more chinks than armour. All
armours have chinks so India had its own before it copied some more
chinks from the West, in order to blend in the West.
This is because
Indian
universities
were
built for clerical
training
not innovation. Indian
universities have failed to create one major political philosophy different from the West. In IT
engineer lingo,
India is systematically trained for
maintenance not development. It
would be wise to get
a reality check.
As per Census 2011, India has 37.24 crore kids in the age group 0-14 years constituting 30.76% of the total population. This huge population translates to India holding the despicable distinction of having world's largest number of child sexual abuses cases. India stand horrified because it knows in its heart that hiding within statistics are real numbers and real young humans. A child less than 16 years is raped every 155th minute. Every 13th hour, a child under 10 is raped. 1 in 10 children have been sexually abused at any point of time. Every second Indian kid is being exposed to one or the other form of sexual abuse and every fifth child faces critical forms of it27. As is evident, Indian schools have failed in protecting students like Indian universities and governments.
A UNICEF survey on demographic and health in India reported that 10% of Indian girls might have experienced sexual violence when they were 10–14 years of age and 30% during 15–19 years of age. Overall, nearly 42% of Indian girls have seen sexual violence before teenage. In 95% cases, the perpetrator is known to the child as relatives, neighbors, step parents and other highly trusted people while kids belonging to the lower socio-economic status are at higher risk28. The issue of sexual abuse is a taboo in India due to fear of indignity, denial, social stigma, mistrust in government, misdemeanour by govrnement and communication gaps between parents and children. A 2018 UNESCO survey on sexual orientation and gender identity related violence in schools of Tamil Nadu is eye-opening. 60% and 50% of the sexual/gender minority youth kids surveyed said they were victims of physical bullying when they were respectively in middle/high school and higher secondary school, while 43% of respondents said that they were sexually harassed when they were in primary school. Only 18% of participants reported such bullying to school authorities and 53% said that school authorities took some action against bullies. The consequences of bullying were quite harsh: 73% had reduced social interactions with their peers; 70% suffered suffered from anxiety and depression; 70% said they lost concentration in studies; 63% reported lower academic performance; and 53% reported having skipped classes About a third (33.2%) said bullying played a key role in discontinuing schools29.
A UNICEF survey on demographic and health in India reported that 10% of Indian girls might have experienced sexual violence when they were 10–14 years of age and 30% during 15–19 years of age. Overall, nearly 42% of Indian girls have seen sexual violence before teenage. In 95% cases, the perpetrator is known to the child as relatives, neighbors, step parents and other highly trusted people while kids belonging to the lower socio-economic status are at higher risk28. The issue of sexual abuse is a taboo in India due to fear of indignity, denial, social stigma, mistrust in government, misdemeanour by govrnement and communication gaps between parents and children. A 2018 UNESCO survey on sexual orientation and gender identity related violence in schools of Tamil Nadu is eye-opening. 60% and 50% of the sexual/gender minority youth kids surveyed said they were victims of physical bullying when they were respectively in middle/high school and higher secondary school, while 43% of respondents said that they were sexually harassed when they were in primary school. Only 18% of participants reported such bullying to school authorities and 53% said that school authorities took some action against bullies. The consequences of bullying were quite harsh: 73% had reduced social interactions with their peers; 70% suffered suffered from anxiety and depression; 70% said they lost concentration in studies; 63% reported lower academic performance; and 53% reported having skipped classes About a third (33.2%) said bullying played a key role in discontinuing schools29.
The
New York Times just reported that more than 4.5
crore online photos and videos of
children being sexually abused were reported by tech companies, more
than double what they found the previous year. India Child Protection
Fund (ICPF) in a report titled Child Sexual Abuse Material in India
mapped 100 Indian cities and towns to find a steep increase in demand
for searches like “child porn”, “sexy child” and “teen sex
videos,” along with an increase in traffic by 95% during the
Chinese virus lockdown. Wishing
an obvious problem to go away magically will not make it go. The
American Academy of Pediatrics reports that in the United States, 42%
of children between 10 and 17 have viewed pornography online.
A Bangalore based NGO, Rescue, reported in 2015 that 70% of students who were surveyed had watched porn from the age of 10 years. Besides, 31% of the boys interviewed watched violent porn content and 93% of the boys admitted that porn was as drugs while 86% of the boys admitted that watching porn does lead to sexual activities. Even if these high numbers are considered exaggerations and halved, for example let’s say 86% is halved to 43% to counter exaggerations, does it make the situation better? 53% children in India between the ages of 5 and 12 have been subjected to some form of sexual abuse. Laws like POCSO are stringent but how many kids can reach the court? Majority of cases are not reported and settled within familial and official institutions. The lack of trust in law is natural because justice is simply inaccessible in India. Like all political leaders, university and school leaders prefer vote bank over conscience. LGBT leaders are walking into a trap by making their movement political. Gender must be kept above politics because it is universal just like human rights. Hyper-active LGBT activists risk trapping their colorful community in majoritarian-minoritarian politics.
Social
media also has become the prime hunting ground for sex traffickers. In
March 2019, Instagram was the leading social media
platform for child grooming by sexual predators. A recent poll of
2,000 teens found that nearly 75% had received pornographic direct
messages from strangers, even if they had a private account. And 55%
of victims of sex trafficking in 2015 met their abuser through a
website, app, or text30,31.
The sexualization of children is occurring in brick-and-mortar spaces
too. India urgently requires to check media led objectification and
sexualization. Kids
have a right to grow and learn in
safe spaces. Indian
schools are simply not safe
enough to become a place where children are exposed to sex apart
from sex-ed. Schools
can start with making media studies as a subject compulsory while
making sex-ed universal. The need is growing strong as we learned from the shocking Bois Locker Room scandal.
Vanity,
validation and victimhood encouraging social media websites have
taken the lead in influencing impressionable minds. Parents have
yielded
parenting to technology. Students in
colleges are taught to be apologetic about history and feel
victimised. Universities which are products of thousands of years of
human wisdom are reduced to politics in name of activism. An
explosion of LGBT activism was bound to awe and
antagonise because
genes
prefer
procreation and recreation, not
depletion.
Current
LGBT-related discourse acts dry while swimming in the dour seas of
cynicism and victimhood.
CONCLUSION
Well-meaning experts tell parents to cultivate little prehomosexual’s native talents so the ultimate genetic payoff could be larger with one very special gay child than it would if ten mediocre straight offsprings. Parents and schools agree that there is a time and place for kids to have fun and a time and place for adults to do the same. Kids come with responsibilities and some spaces are simply not age-appropriate for them. Indian pride parades can be deemed child-friendly only if they follow no-alcohol, no-drugs, no-nudity rules.
Drug usage has risen amongst the youth, along with internet brought perversity and numbness. Schools and universities can not be allowed to over-rule the parents or nature. If they value democracy and sanity, they must liberate the children so they feel safe and brave enough to live normal painless lives, instead of recruiting them for pride parades. Human welfare and progress does not lie in aping, it is rooted in innovation because had it been otherwise, humans would still have been apes in green jungles. Indian LGBT must stop aping the Left or the West just because ‘anti-establishment’ looks cool because it does not. It looks juvenile and desperate. Life and the internet is more than just memes. We live in a world where teenagers often talk of depression as if it's cool. Merely branding something as cool by social media influencers does not make it cool in the sense the original word means. LGBT-related issues need sensitivity and empathy, not pressure and hate. Just like radicals on all sides harm society in general, radicals in LGBT harm themselves.
1. India
has 2.5m gays, government tells supreme court - BBC News.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-17363200.
2. Section
377 verdict: Section 377: Here’s everything you need to know |
Whats is Section 377?
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/sc-delivers-historic-verdict-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-section-377/articleshow/65698429.cms?from=mdr.
3. What
Percentage of the Population Is Gay?
https://news.gallup.com/poll/6961/what-percentage-population-gay.aspx.
4. Kanazawa,
S. Intelligence and homosexuality. J. Biosoc. Sci. 44,
595–623 (2012).
5. INTELLIGENCE
AND HOMOSEXUALITY | Journal of Biosocial Science | Cambridge Core.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science/article/intelligence-and-homosexuality/E07585DD50D9924C677EFC7B6060AB0A.
6. Gandhi
Timeline - Life Chronology of Mahatma Gandhi.
https://gandhiashramsabarmati.org/en/the-mahatma/life-chronology.html.
7. Indian
Government Spends $1.3 Million To Stop Auction Of Gandhi Letters
That May Show He Was Gay | HuffPost India.
https://www.huffingtonpost.in/entry/india-government-buys-gandhi-letters-to-stop-auction_n_1668466?ri18n=true.
8. Tagore
International School, Vasant Vihar.
http://tagoreint.com/vv/V2.0/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1863.
9. Top
10 Pre-Lenten Celebrations - Travel - National Geographic.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/top-10/pre-lenten-carnivals/.
10. The
LGBT side of Carnival in Brazil.
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2018/02/07/lgbt-side-carnival-brazil/.
11. What
Is the Meaning of the Pink Triangle? From Nazi Label to Gay Pride
Symbol - HISTORY.
https://www.history.com/news/pink-triangle-nazi-concentration-camps.
12. What
Happened at the Stonewall Riots? A Timeline of the 1969 Uprising -
HISTORY. https://www.history.com/news/stonewall-riots-timeline.
13. Childhood/Adolescence
- The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People -
NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64808/.
14. Is
your child a ‘prehomosexual’? Forecasting adult sexual
orientation - Scientific American Blog Network.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/is-your-child-a-prehomosexual-forecasting-adult-sexual-orientation/.
15. Moran,
M. Spitzer Issues Apology for Study Supporting Reparative Therapy.
Psychiatr. News 47, 1b – 23 (2012).
16. Psychological
Consequences for High School Students of Having Been Sexually
Harassed | Request PDF.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226590992_Psychological_Consequences_for_High_School_Students_of_Having_Been_Sexually_Harassed.
17. Opinion
| My New Vagina Won’t Make Me Happy - The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/24/opinion/sunday/vaginoplasty-transgender-medicine.html.
18. Sex
Change: Physically Impossible, Psychosocially Unhelpful, and
Philosophically Misguided - Public Discourse.
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2018/03/21151/.
19. New
York Times Reveals Painful Truths About ‘Sex Change’ Surgery |
The Heritage Foundation.
https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/new-york-times-reveals-painful-truths-about-sex-change-surgery.
20. Sex
Reassignment Doesn’t Work. Here Is the Evidence. | The Heritage
Foundation.
https://www.heritage.org/gender/commentary/sex-reassignment-doesnt-work-here-the-evidence.
21. Transgenderism:
A Pathogenic Meme - Public Discourse.
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/06/15145/.
22. How
School Bullying Impacts Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
(LGBT) Young Adults. http://mcclellandinstitute.arizona.edu.
23. Sims,
C. S., Drasgow, F. & Fitzgerald, L. F. The effects of sexual
harassment on turnover in the military: Time-dependent modeling.
Journal of Applied Psychology vol. 90 1141–1152 (2005).
24. When
should I teach my child to call 911? | Parents.
https://www.parents.com/toddlers-preschoolers/safety/when-should-i-teach-my-child-to-call-911/.
25. Height
of Indians growing at one of the slowest rates in the world: Study.
https://www.livemint.com/Politics/MykyWXJ0bGCLcvZLSw4KoK/Height-of-Indians-growing-at-one-of-the-slowest-rates-in-the.html.
26. Facts
About Homosexuality and Child Molestation.
https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html.
27. Over
53% children face sexual abuse: Survey | India News - Times of
India.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Over-53-children-face-sexual-abuse-Survey/articleshow/1881344.cms.
28. (No
Title). https://www.unicef.org/sitan/files/SitAn_India_May_2011.pdf.
29. New
study on bullying based on sexual orientation and gender identity in
schools in Tamil Nadu, India.
https://en.unesco.org/news/new-study-bullying-based-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-schools-tamil-nadu-india.
30. Wolak,
J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J. & Ybarra, M. L. Online
‘Predators’ and Their Victims: Myths, Realities, and
Implications for Prevention and Treatment. Am. Psychol. 63,
111–128 (2008).
31. Babchishin,
K. M., Hanson, R. K. & Hermann, C. A. The characteristics of
online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sex. Abus. J. Res. Treat.
23, 92–123 (2011).





































